As you transition from writing code that works to writing code that lasts, you’ll find that maintainability is the most valuable trait a codebase can possess. Maintainable code is easy to read, test, modify, and extend – qualities that directly impact a project’s long-term success and your team’s happiness.
The best practices are often the simplest. Here are 5 foundational habits that will make your Java code easier to maintain.
Practice 1: Use Clear and Meaningful Names
Clear names are the first and most important form of documentation. They reduce the mental effort needed to understand the code’s purpose.
For Developers: When a developer (yourself or a teammate) looks at the code, they immediately grasp the purpose of a variable, method, or class. This speeds up feature development and bug fixing.
For Testers: Clear names can help quickly understand the system’s logic. That helps create better test coverage and more accurate bug reports.
| Type | Bad Example | Good Example |
| Variable | int d; | int daysSinceLastUpdate; |
| Method | public void proc(List<T> l) | public void processOrderList(List<Order> orders) |
| Class | class Mng | class SystemConfigurationManager |
Quick Naming Tips (Java Standard)
Classes/Interfaces:
- Use Upper Camel Case or Pascal Case (e.g., PaymentGateway).
- Use nouns describing the object’s role or responsibility (e.g., Order, UserService).
Methods:
- Use Lower Camel Case (e.g., sendEmail).
- Use verbs or verb phrases that clearly state what the method does (e.g., calculateTotal(), validateInput()).
Variables:
- Use Lower Camel Case (e.g., userName).
- Use nouns or noun phrases. For boolean variables, prefix them with a verb like is, has, or can (e.g., isLoggedIn, hasPermission).
Constants:
- Use ALL_CAPS with underscores (e.g., MAX_ATTEMPTS).
Practice 2: Keep Your Methods Short and Focused
Small methods are easier to test, debug, and reuse without causing unintended side effects. This is because they adhere to the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). They also make the code’s high-level flow much clearer.
Before (Monolithic Method):
public void processOrder(Order order) {
// 1. Validate the order
if (order.getItems().isEmpty()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Order is empty");
}
// 2. Calculate final price (complex logic here)
double total = order.getItems().stream()
.mapToDouble(Item::getPrice)
.sum();
total *= (1 - order.getDiscountRate());
order.setFinalPrice(total);
// 3. Update inventory
inventoryService.updateStock(order.getItems());
// 4. Send confirmation email
emailService.sendConfirmation(order);
}After (Broken into Focused Methods):
public void processOrder(Order order) {
validateOrder(order);
calculateFinalPrice(order);
updateInventory(order);
sendConfirmation(order);
}
private void validateOrder(Order order) {
if (order.getItems().isEmpty()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Order is empty");
}
}
private void calculateFinalPrice(Order order) {
// Isolated logic for price calculation
}
// ... other focused methods (updateInventory, sendConfirmation)The refactored processOrder method acts as a clear and readable table of contents for the entire workflow. If a bug appears in the price calculation, you know exactly which small method to check.
Practice 3: Don’t Repeat Yourself (DRY)
The DRY principle states that every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation. Violating DRY (WET – We Enjoy Typing) is a major source of bugs. If you have duplicated code, a bug fix or feature update in one place might be forgotten in the other, leading to hard-to-trace errors.
Duplicated Logic (WET):
public double calculateShippingForDomestic(Order order) {
// Logic: 10% of total price, min $5
double base = order.getTotalPrice() * 0.10;
return Math.max(base, 5.00); // Duplicated logic part 1
}
public double calculateShippingForInternational(Order order) {
// Logic: 10% of total price, min $5 + $10 international fee
double base = order.getTotalPrice() * 0.10;
return Math.max(base, 5.00) + 10.00; // Duplicated logic part 2
}Refactored Logic (DRY):
// Single, reusable method for the common logic
private double getBaseShippingCost(double totalPrice) {
double base = totalPrice * 0.10;
return Math.max(base, 5.00);
}
public double calculateShippingForDomestic(Order order) {
// Calls the single source of truth
return getBaseShippingCost(order.getTotalPrice());
}
public double calculateShippingForInternational(Order order) {
// Calls the single source of truth, then adds the unique logic
return getBaseShippingCost(order.getTotalPrice()) + 10.00;
}The common logic is now isolated in getBaseShippingCost(). So if the 10% rule changes, you only update it in one place.
Practice 4: Prepare Your Code for Localization with Java i18n
This is the future-proofing step. Hardcoding user-facing text into your source code creates massive technical debt. When your company decides to expand to a new market (e.g., from the US to Japan), you’ll face a long and costly code rewrite.
Externalizing strings (or i18n) prepares your application for this. For detailed steps and implementation specifics, refer to the Java i18n guide.
All text that the user sees (UI labels, error messages, etc.) should be moved out of the Java source code and into external files. Small example:
| Hardcoded | Externalized | |
| Snippet | button.setText(“Submit”); | button.setText(messages.getString(“ui.button.submit”)); |
The text is stored in Resource Bundles (simple .properties files). For example:
- Messages_en.properties: ui.button.submit=Submit
- Messages_fr.properties: ui.button.submit=Soumettre
Java’s java.util.ResourceBundle automatically loads the correct file based on the user’s locale, allowing translators to update the text without touching a single line of Java code.
Practice 5: Write Comments That Explain Why, Not What
While code should be self-documenting (Practice 1), it can never fully explain the why. Good comments provide context for future developers by documenting non-obvious business rules, technical trade-offs, or workarounds for external system limitations.
Bad Comment (Redundant):
// Check if the current user is an administrator
if (currentUser.getRole().equals(Role.ADMIN)) {
// ...
}The code is perfectly clear. But this comment adds no value and will quickly become outdated.
Good Comment (Explains the Why):
// Business Rule: As mandated by compliance, we cannot allow more than 5 password
// reset emails per user per hour to prevent account lockouts and mitigate spam attacks.
if (user.getResetAttempts() >= MAX_ATTEMPTS) {
log.warn("User {} exceeded reset limit.", user.getId());
return;
}This comment explains the business constraint and security rationale behind the if statement, which is vital context for maintenance.
One More Good Comment Example:
// WORKAROUND: The third-party API intermittently returns a 500 error
// if the data payload is > 1MB. We split the data here to avoid the size limit
// until the vendor fixes their issue.
if (data.getSize() > MAX_API_PAYLOAD) {
splitAndSend(data);
}This comment prevents a future developer from removing the “unnecessary” splitting logic.
Conclusion
By using these 5 simple practices, you make your Java code professional and easy to maintain.
Remember, the goal isn’t just to write code that the computer understands, but to write code that other developers can easily understand and change.
About The Author
